Correct solutions to Zeno's Paradoxes require that they be fully congruent with observable reality. That is, that they are at least not contrary to experimental or physical evidence.

The article "Congruent Solutions to Zeno's Paradoxes" provides an overview of how the evidence of quantum mechanics can be integrated with everyday life to correctly solve the (supposedly perplexing) issue of the paradox of physical motion.

All other solutions that rely on calculus (typical of the vast majority of solutions offered in textbooks, universities and the Internet) require the assumption of 'perfect continuity' of space-time and physical motion, an assumption that quantum mechanics has now shown to be unsupported by the evidence.  As physicist David Bohm states: "according to the quantum theory, movement is not fundamentally continuous."1. As renowned physicist Richard Feynman remarked over 40 years ago "...that space is continuous is, I believe, wrong."2

In light of the quantum evidence, we can confidently expect that the vast majority of scientific and philosophical opinion on the subject of Zeno's Paradoxes (based on infinite-series solutions which are reliant on the assumption of a continuous space-time) is wrong.

As detailed in the section "Zeno's Paradoxes" various 'thought-experiments' undermine the standard 'perfect-continuity' assumptions of science. The experiments reveal how standard infinite-series solutions are unable to explain or correspond to the the measurable, observable facts.

1. 1. David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge, London 1995, page 202.
2. 2. Professor Richard Feynman, The Messenger Series: Seeking New Laws.